Re: [Debconf-team] Call for Help: DebConf14 Bursaries Team
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
On 14/05/14 01:53, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> "Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)" <faw@funlabs.org> writes:
>> On Friday night or Saturday, I will send the initial instructions
>> about what we have to do and what is our common rules.
>
> Which process do you intend to use? I much prefered the process we used
> last year to the penta based rating the previous year. I don't know if
> summit has any facility to help with the process at all.
Nothing really special or much different from previous years.
Summit has a similar rating system, the main difference is that we will
try to use only one "ranking score" for both travel and food/accommodation,
instead of two (one for travel and another for food/accommodation).
> Last year there was also an idea to do condorcet voting on the requests
> which sounded like a nice idea. The idea is that every member of the
> team assembles a (partial) ordering of the requests and we run that
> through condorcet to get the list of sponsored people.
The idea is interesting, but I believe it is too late for us to try it.
> We did not do that in the end, because the total amount of available
> money was bigger than the amount of sponsorship requested. So we only
> sorted out unreasonable request.
Unfortunately, we are not that lucky this year, the total amount of
sponsorship requested is greater than our budget, so we will have to
go thru the score and ranking process.
Kind regards,
- --
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) <faw@funlabs.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=UidC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: