also sprach Richard Hartmann <richih.mailinglist@gmail.com> [2014-04-17 12:17 +0200]:
> > However, starting the fiscal year not on 1 January is exceptional,
> > and starting it not on the first of a month even more so. While it's
> > not impossible, Andi's right in saying that it'll mean additional
> > steps and additional dealing with the financial authorities.
>
> If we don't really save effort by juggling around the start date, why not
> start on 01.01 or 01.02., then?
Let's make it 1 May.
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@debconf.org>
: :' : DebConf orga team
`. `'`
`- DebConf14: Portland, OR, USA: http://debconf14.debconf.org
DebConf15: Heidelberg, Germany
Attachment:
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)