|
Hi,
On Montag, 8. April 2013, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: > > Le Camp doesnt really care for what we spent our money (as long as they > > get roughly what we predicted we would spent) > I don't think this is true.
this is true. believe me, please. i talked with them about this.
> Asking for this change now, will cause > significant unhappyness on their side at least. And as the contract we > signed includes breakfast they can also just reject such a proposal.
we can also do things.
in the end this is called negotiation.
> I'm quite sure that for them skipping breakfast sounds quite unusal.
this whole debconf thing is unusual to them.
> The > costs of breakfast are part of their calculation and we can't really > guarantee that we will pay the same amount of money to them even if we > don't take breakfast.
you also didnt seem to get the other idea i brought up, which is that debconf should not pay for the breakfast.
if this saves debconf 20k, i think we should consider this.
i rather skip breakfast, then debcamp.
> Renegotiating this now is really not something I'm prepared to do.
just accepting reality as it seems to be is also not something i'm prepared to do.
> If > someone really has the courage to go to Le Camp with that proposal, I > won't stay in their way, but don't count on me to do it.
omg, holger
|
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.