On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 11:25:37AM +0100, Ana Guerrero wrote: > On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 12:08:02PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > At the risk of repeating myself: we should not provide late travel > > sponsorship, *at all*. It's an inefficient use of funds. If we can't > > provide travel sponsorship in a timely manner, *don't* provide travel > > sponsorship - save the money for next year when it will do more good. > Do you think providing travel sponsorship 4 months ahead is not timely? > If that's the case, we'll have to agree to disagree. No. The mail I was replying to didn't say anything about providing travel sponsorship 4 months ahead, it talked about providing it "late". 4 months ahead isn't late. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slangasek@ubuntu.com vorlon@debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature