Re: [Debconf-team] A better budget analysis

To: debconf-team@lists.debconf.org
Subject: Re: [Debconf-team] A better budget analysis
From: Michael Banck <mbanck@debian.org>
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 17:35:05 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20121102163505.GC23625@nighthawk.chemicalconnection.dyndns.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 201211021725.03362.holger@layer-acht.org>
References: <20121030022040.GE26912@pyke.zgib.net> <874nlbwtyz.fsf@meteor.durcheinandertal.bofh> <20121031165441.GF29166@nighthawk.chemicalconnection.dyndns.org> <[🔎] 201211021725.03362.holger@layer-acht.org>

On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 05:25:02PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> IIRC but I'm fairly sure I do. (And I'm sooo fine with solving these
> details later.)

If it has no impact on the budget, then sure, by all means let's discuss
it later.


Michael

Reply to:

References:
- Re: [Debconf-team] A better budget analysis
  - From: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>

Prev by Date: Re: [Debconf-team] DebConf13 local organization
Next by Date: Re: [Debconf-team] A better budget analysis
Previous by thread: Re: [Debconf-team] A better budget analysis
Next by thread: Re: [Debconf-team] A better budget analysis
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread