Re: [Debconf-team] budget status (was: Re: Status on Brandts Hotel)
- To: debconf-team@lists.debconf.org
- Subject: Re: [Debconf-team] budget status (was: Re: Status on Brandts Hotel)
- From: Richard Darst <rkd@zgib.net>
- Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 03:10:16 -0400
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20120702071016.GG3115@boltzmann.zgib.net>
- Mail-followup-to: debconf-team@lists.debconf.org
- In-reply-to: <20120630081917.GD3115@boltzmann.zgib.net>
- References: <CAEL=UvV+MNVOhJbceGC-KOJ-Q7Nua6_+5KjCpnoxYVWFUqT-dQ@mail.gmail.com> <201206291747.51276.holger@layer-acht.org> <CAHNEgDkj8ZjkPxuzpjEWSyKnmaRHYnhQ6gYi-Dq_AAGnTF+FBw@mail.gmail.com> <20120630081917.GD3115@boltzmann.zgib.net>
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 04:19:17AM -0400, Richard Darst wrote:
> 19:07 < darst> dc12_net = -21k$ + 3-5k$(more attendee fees?) +
> food_cost_savings + "other costs"_inaccuracies
So, this is embarrasing, but there was a long-standing error in the
budget spreadsheet (not summing everything; I never made structural
changes in that part of the sheet so I never noticed), missing out on
attendee fees professional fees. But some other costs have gone up a
tiny bit, too, but overall, it is much better. Thanks to Henning for
fixing this.
So now we are at
dc12_net = -8k$ + 3-5k$(more attendee fees?) + food_cost_savings +
"other costs"_inaccuracies
> dc12_net = dc12_income - dc12_expenses. So dc12_net=0 would be
> cost-neutral and all dc11 surplus would be available for dc13.
>
> dc12_net does *not* include the dc11 surplus of about 25 kUSD. The
> meaning of the dc12 surplus is that we *really* don't want dc12_net to
> be less than -25 kUSD.
>
> surplus_for_dc13 = dc12_net (which is negative, remember) + 25 kUSD
New commentary: doing good to end up not using much surplus if all the
other cost savings come true. Considering dc12 surplus, we have a
nice buffer. Still, all cost-cutting practical will help the future.
- Richard
--
| Richard Darst - rkd@ - boltzmann: up 1077 days, 3:59
| http://rkd.zgib.net - pgp 0xBD356740
| "Ye shall know the truth and -- the truth shall make you free"
Reply to: