2011/6/9 Damyan Ivanov
<dmn@debian.org>
-=| Leandro Gómez, Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 09:21:24AM -0600 |=-
> Platinum sponsors:
> Max. Height - 100px
> Max. Width - 220px
>
> Gold sponsors:
> Max. Height - 60px
> Max. Width - 200px
>
> Silver sponsors:
> Max. Height - 50px
> Max. Width - 180px
>
> Bronze sponsors:
> Max. Height - 45px
> Max. Width - 140px
>
> Steel sponsors:
> Max. Height - 40px
> Max. Width - 100px
These work very good if the logos are all wide. The TK logo is tall,
though and becomes really small compared to the others. Would it be
better if we aim at total pixels used, with some bonus to the
non-rectangular logos (google, hp)?
My approach was to use the max. height as a reference if the logo was tall and the max. width if it was the opposite. Anyways, I agree with you that it's a better idea to use a total pixels count to determine the sizes of each logo.
In any case, I am ready to commit a logo update according to the above
limits.
Nice! Thank you! :)
Cheers,
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)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=ufwH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----