Re: [Debconf-team] registration@ and talks@ aliases
Yea, I'm in.
Adnan
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Velimir Iveljic
<velimir.lists@foolcontrol.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Yes, me and Adnan perhaps for local team, but if he is too busy with
> other stuff i think i could manage on my own.
>
> @visa team is fine, we need to start going through the list of
> registered people and see who needs a visa, so we can get right on it!
>
>
> Velimir
>
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Richard Darst <rkd@zgib.net> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We need to get registration@ and talks@ aliases set up.
>>
>> registration@ - should have nattie (volunteered to join registration
>> team), me (to provide continuity with previous years: I don't plan on
>> being too active, if someone else wants to provide continuity).
>> schultmc can join if ey wants (SPI contact for payments). I can
>> probably be the FFIS payment contact.
>>
>> We could use one or two local people who know things about hotels,
>> accommodation, etc. Velimir? Eventually, we'll add the room
>> assigners to this alias (gwolf and amaya are listed on the teams page,
>> would you like to join now?).
>>
>> talks@ - gwolf will hold down this alias for now, until the rest of
>> the team is added. (has this replaced the old committee@ alias?)
>>
>> (other aliases:)
>>
>> venue@ - old alias from last year, for archival/communication cc
>> purposes. Can be removed unless local people this year would like it.
>>
>> visa@ - is this team doing OK ?
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> - Richard
>>
>> --
>> | Richard Darst - rkd@ - boltzmann: up 632 days, 9:07
>> | http://rkd.zgib.net - pgp 0xBD356740
>> | "Ye shall know the truth and -- the truth shall make you free"
>> _______________________________________________
>> Debconf-team mailing list
>> Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org
>> http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Debconf-team mailing list
> Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org
> http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
>
Reply to: