Re: [Debconf-team] DebConf GLOBAL team - Report
I'm sending this for second time, as some of you said that they never
even got the first email.
-----
@Gunnar,
Basically they are all double beds, the only beds that are "one
person" size are those in dorms.
@Team,
Regardless, I'm planing to go to Banja Luka this Thursday, is there
anything else that needs to be taken care of and are we on clear with
hotel reservations as I was planing to do have that finished.
Adnan
Sent using Android (Nexus S)
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Adnan Hodzic <adnan@foolcontrol.org> wrote:
> @Gunnar,
>
> Basically they are all double beds, the only beds that are "one person" size
> are those in dorms.
>
> @Team,
>
> Regardless, I'm planing to go to Banja Luka this Thursday, is there anything
> else that needs to be taken care of and are we on clear with hotel
> reservations as I was planing to do have that finished.
>
> AdnanAdnan
>
> Sent using Android (Nexus S)
>
> On Apr 4, 2011 8:18 PM, "Gunnar Wolf" <gwolf@gwolf.org> wrote:
>> Adnan Hodzic dijo [Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 08:13:30PM +0200]:
>>> > - Regular room (single bed, sharing room)
>>> > - Regular room (am willing to share a double bed with someone)
>>> > - Regular room (double bed, am going with my couple)
>>> > - I will arrange my own
>>>
>>> Actually this sounds really good to me.
>>>
>>> > - Regular room (single bed, sharing room)
>>>
>>> This would be I prefer to be alone by myself :)
>>
>> Umh, this leads to misunderstandings then. A "single" bed is a
>> "single-person-width" bed. A "double" bed is a "wide" bed. English
>> natives, how would this best resolve?
>>
>>> >> Finishing Penta should be our number one priority.
>>> >
>>> > It is basically done. The problem is... Understanding the many hidden
>>> > knobs in the beast :( The modifications are _really_ simple.
>>>
>>> Do you think we could have it open for "testing" purposes?
>>
>> Once I understand the bits needed to safely push it, we can open it
>> for production. Believe me, the modifications are trivial, but the
>> processes are not. And right now, with Ganneff away, I can only step
>> verrrry carefuly trying to understand things and not break any. Right
>> now, I'm trying to set the instance on pentatest - It's almost done,
>> but I don't dare push a thing to cletus before making sure it's
>> fine. I'm trying to understand why a table does not like its own
>> structure :-P
>
Reply to: