Re: [Debconf-team] [Debconf11-localteam] Header Issues
> * Could you please make a version without those white lines on the main
> building?
> It's all good, but I too would like to see a version without white
> lines or at least thiner white lines. It's kinda crippling buildings
> architecture.
Actually the more I think about it, besides thiner white lines, what
you could also try to do is make images on building facade/windows
even more transparent by some >=35% && <=50% then they already are.
Adnan
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Adnan Hodzic <adnan@foolcontrol.org> wrote:
>>> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/21510751/dc1107.png
>
> Now this is what I call a header! Leondro, rock on! :)
>
>> * Header height is too large in my opinion. When I open the site on my
>> laptop, almost 70% of the site is just header. Scrolling down each time
>> you open a new page may get really annoying. Height reduction may be in
>> order...
>
> Doesn't matter, it's different then any other DebConf header so far.
> Classic "header" height is way to boring and after DC10 header it's
> time to bring in some radical changes. Besides, we could make the
> header interactive using JavaScript as well, right?
>
> I'm using 1440x900 and this height is good, if it has to go lower then
> right now I'd go 50px max, 25px top 25px bottom. Or maybe 35px top and
> 15px bottom.
>
>> * As for the width of the header, I assume you don't want it be
>> repeatable. If so then site width will have to match headers width (1280px).
>
> Width is different story, I'd definitely want the whole thing to be
> there and so it doesn't repeat. Since this action may make
> dispositional of the whole image, what I suggest is to center whole
> website to the middle. It's too wide either way.
>
>> * Could you please make a version without those white lines on the main
>> building?
>
> It's all good, but I too would like to see a version without white
> lines or at least thiner white lines. It's kinda crippling buildings
> architecture.
>
>> @ Valessio Brito
>> On 02/18/2011 05:28 PM, Valessio Brito wrote:
>>> other proposal is resize header to 100px...
>>> see: http://valessiobrito.info/tmp/dc11/
>>
>> This is great and simple header, could you please try blending all the
>> buildings with one background, sky preferably, so it looks as if they're
>> all located in one street, right next to each other.
>
> Absolutely not, what Leonardo did here is the winning combination, he
> just needs to tailor it bit more with our help.
>
> Leonardo, again, great job!
>
>
> Adnan
>
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Vedran Omeragic
> <vedran@vedranomeragic.com> wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> @ Leandro Gómez
>>
>> On 02/20/2011 09:13 PM, Leandro Gómez wrote:
>>>
>>> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/21510751/dc1107.png
>>>
>>
>> Hi,
>> first of all, thank you for helping us with header, and I really liked
>> the one from the link above. However, several issues with this:
>>
>> * Header height is too large in my opinion. When I open the site on my
>> laptop, almost 70% of the site is just header. Scrolling down each time
>> you open a new page may get really annoying. Height reduction may be in
>> order...
>>
>> * As for the width of the header, I assume you don't want it be
>> repeatable. If so then site width will have to match headers width (1280px).
>>
>> * Could you please make a version without those white lines on the main
>> building?
>>
>>
>> @ Valessio Brito
>> On 02/18/2011 05:28 PM, Valessio Brito wrote:
>>> other proposal is resize header to 100px...
>>> see: http://valessiobrito.info/tmp/dc11/
>>
>> This is great and simple header, could you please try blending all the
>> buildings with one background, sky preferably, so it looks as if they're
>> all located in one street, right next to each other.
>>
>>
>> Thank you all for helping us out,
>> Vedran
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
>>
>> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJNYn+WAAoJEEIU23x/a5749b8P/RjQftN+PBW+xrv6zqV48s4h
>> jnCyNnqOxQVp2IfgwVOH8RKiam/pngWKdNkRjW9YDfK9yp8r7W8SsrH4hp/hvm4D
>> 2nRVnt/FrIHfrMuyVZVez8bLHHPWz21i6FiS27Z6PJoy0o4gMAY20NxKktNOD/9m
>> UkLc3+fvU8mExq3oF/wG9AbFe5o89oKiQuZS3YSh31DZ9ES26AbY5/p4kqtrsY/P
>> DU3GA7qWN62YLG1TIVhMop45d2jUUzTC+/Mk7A6xEu+RLTHS/XpGacTLc21/oQs9
>> MNHasnHSK4Zow6dn4uhV0j0hIGEN9K0ZiJlrrmbB1CSNB9ygNDmapc4GFTjAJCbW
>> 4MLBuTE/Fkcp2IgARlprfABURfors2uvgCnAS1VQ8/YucFOViJoxhNJNJuHHpkde
>> N6ZGo33UbeNn096dGCKJbBXU+WWj1VDRO4MMmMfE4KodWmtRX2MwieTDtZcBqgQk
>> 1/UUt8nBgP3f5gd/7p/+Cr7a3HU2XQnjSNvbXlt501Q3TPZA0CHV0upKzd5lye+n
>> 0KhmFxPTmSp5QhyU5ijnI4mAe4OUS7Kr23E+MKmXyCwY9rJGBnrEXQ0uhEEckMnw
>> dW/4rX30Z0zg/vRpgem1jgS57mC8SQ7a1yxfChl2uaYgAWmvU9JQTbX70jbNDQRJ
>> DBNpCwrwO3g8X50IoqAM
>> =efRt
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> _______________________________________________
>> Debconf11-localteam mailing list
>> Debconf11-localteam@lists.debconf.org
>> http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf11-localteam
>>
>
Reply to: