I would also like to mention that, the reduction of the sponsorship packages wasn't ONLY because of the local sponsors
not being able to reach higher sponsor levels, but MOSTLY because of the reasons i mentioned in my previous mail.
Velimir
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:07 PM, Damyan Ivanov
<dmn@debian.org> wrote:
-=| Velimir Iveljic, Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 08:40:33PM +0100 |=-
> I don't think this will be necessary, as we agreed to not have 2 types of
> sponsorship (meaning local and global).
> One sponsorship type should be enough.
Okay.
Still, the thresholds and the rearrangement proposed by Holger are
worth a meeting, I think.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJNG6MVAAoJEOQbTFV/DYC+AX4QAJZeW+svX2tSgWIwe5Y+6RAZ
yW4n5OzhtXr05x4axfzMepk/mQj8bH46yXDTt2O0686eoWhxG35LO9fL+sCsV6Lw
ksxwYy1zOzz2I0Ht6PtPE2bvZfWFZv7Fv4rH9b+3LxHhZgeaxPHXCm7vaaemV9/a
T5iHrpDLjrCgC2XcusBbgm6RXuJDq5IgC8lmjETTgmjzmW2VVcdbUTjqrxkeTBy0
AYoUhpWJl88wlA7vq5wFsPC/aAnBm5dPGY2fw0IFOv1xWIi7S4V7HDxBp/dNL50Y
XInFbzOJa+GiyurX7A2e/U823yjgav9mocOM6HiJepMmRlFS2wvb0e7iOCXgG7ym
EAJOR3CQbfZkyvVggmc0ua1ehG3bXbnNz3xmEmLrVaBuVn9LaWkaRIk76Eg1uYjp
pFIRSI7CCT3z+2D2GQZJfpAhRcZJFyAqkUPlO9n0jVVUYFPlzZWh2SBb8CUcFrR8
fU3GTg9DuaHx7uc9jzAh6f/sKqFtxyXouCPnmEaqbDMuZxFHplOWitTj0XmrnmQw
Xv/wx1m7nbF6eUsKddcUvFzqQDF0aq5C7IDRCx8H0dTiP9Xjd9A6eNpVGr7lXWem
5jEbr5+0G9kZpg1gFjHIC0CFEiaWLCgZFyho316U7h2Zp6UV5oUR2IbL0RX+nd/C
r44LuuZTVyOr1PHnS3wL
=DnxZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Debconf-team mailing list
Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org
http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team