Hi, On Freitag, 17. Dezember 2010, Brian Gupta wrote: > Looking at it from a sponsor's point of view, raising the donation > threshold would raise questions, where lowering it really won't, but > might raise questions later if we decide we need to raise them again. which will likely happen, when we get less government sponsorship next time. > I also think that repeat sponsors are prepared to sponsor to the same > "level" and will just pay what that price is. So if a bronze sponsor > from 2010 paid $2k, charging any less would leave money on the table. > Basically I think consistency and predictability to sponsors is a good > thing. I tend to agree with this. I _assume_ the low(er) amounts are due to two things: a.) the government sponsorship this year and b.) to make it "easier" for local companies to reach higher sponsor levels. (Assuming this is right) we _could_ probably introduce different levels for local companies, but I'm not sure this is a good idea. cheers, Holger
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.