On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 01:47:04PM -0400, Pablo Duboue wrote:
> We had a well-attended (and well-behaved :-) BoF chaired by Zack (I'm
> cc: directly, but I remembered you saying you'll joing debconf-team,
> so let us know and we can drop the explicit CC:).
I confirm that I'm subscribed to this list, since a few days ago.
(FWIW I'm subscribed as zack@d.o, but I hope the leader@d.o address can
remain white-listed, so that future DPLs will be able to bother this
list participants as well *g*.)
Thanks for the minutes Pablo and, while we are at it, also for the BoF!
> The question is of course how to follow on from here. Ideas? (maybe
> discussing this in -project?)
IMHO the road ahead is something like:
- reach an agreement inside debconf-team on sponsoring guidelines
(this will probably be the longest part; I would be happy to
participate in the discussion)
- *document those guidelines* on the debconf wiki and point at them from
penta, for the next round of sponsoring
(this is the most important part for the rest of the community)
- announce the guidelines on d-d-a
At that point, if people disagree with the guidelines, they will be free
to re-discuss the issue at large on -project and/or try to override the
taken decision (assuming in the meantime we will have clarified
debconf/debian relationship which, as we now, is the other big topic
ahead of us).
Just my 0.02€,
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
Quando anche i santi ti voltano le spalle, | . |. I've fans everywhere
ti resta John Fante -- V. Caposella .......| ..: |.......... -- C. Adams
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature