On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 05:19:28PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On 07/12/2010 02:31 AM, Richard Darst wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 09:55:52AM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > > > >> To recap the proposals: > >> > >> (0 is the status quo) > >> > >> 0: 10:00-12:00, LUNCH, 14:00-16:00, Break, 16:30-19:30 > >> > >> M: 9:30-12:30, LUNCH, 14:00-18:00 > >> X: 9:30-11:30, LUNCH, 13:00-15:00, Break, 15:30-18:30 > >> Y: 9:00-12:00, LUNCH, 13:30-15:30, Break, 16:00-18:00 > >> Z: 9:30-11:30, LUNCH, 12:30-14:30, Break, 15:00-18:00 > > > > Which of these was eventually selected? > > None has been selected. schultmc was the only person good enough to > voice an opinion (he prefers Z). Of course, i'm assuming that marga > prefers M. > > I actually prefer Y myself, i think, though i understand that a 9am > start time is considered cruel and unusual by several usually vocal > parties (though i don't think that concern has been voiced in this thread). Anything but Y, with a preference for 0. I'm not a morning person. X out of the 9:30 start options - an hour seems a bit tight for lunch. J. -- If at first you don't succeed, create an "NT" version. This .sig brought to you by the letter M and the number 44 Product of the Republic of HuggieTag
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature