On Dienstag, 13. Juli 2010, micah anderson wrote: > Its going to have to, and we have already spent far too much time in the > last months discussing this and scheduling things to re-open it > now. This would have been a good argument to bring up over a month ago, > but I'm sorry its too late now to do this. if only people had listened a month ago or whenever this was brought up first. also, we requiere people to participate in the previous debconf, so they can get experience. we experienced exactly what i described at dc9, dc8, ... but yeah, for some people this is something new. > It seems to me that the break down has been the video team caving to > these last minute requests, rather than sticking to a "NO". So, you are > going to have to change that, not all of debconf. the videoteam is too big, someone will turn it on. also i still dont get whats so hard about scheduling 24h in advance. pretty please, don't cc: me. thank you for reading so far.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.