[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [Debconf-team] sponsorship levels



On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 03:55:26PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I honestly think it's a big mistake not to go with sponsorship levels, as was 
> "decided" (*) in the sponsorship team meeting:
> 
> 1. I believe, that we get more money from sponsors, if they have an incentive 
> to spend more money to reach higher levels. Currently it doesnt really matter 
> how much money they give. Organizers of other free-software conferences  
> supported me in this view.
> 
> 2. We need to rate non-money sponsors (bandwidth, hardware, etc) anyway, to 
> sort the sponsors by donation on the webpage. Which we already do. 
> 
> 3. If we have "upper-class" (the 5-7 big ones) sponsors , those are likely to 
> be mentioned in press articles. (We can better influence, that our top 
> sponsors are mentioned, because thats those from the two highest levels of 
> sponsorship.) If we dont have "upper-class" sponsors, the press might choose 
> some, which is not really fair to the sponsors who give much money. And as we 
> will have >20 sponsors, no article will mention them all.
> 
> 4. If we dont have sponsor classes, my (poorly doing) freelancing business is 
> thinking of sponsoring debconf too, to get on the t-shirt. I think it's 
> riduculous to get on the t-shirt for any sum. 
> 
> 5. So we have (or need) levels already, but we dont have clear 
> boundaries/rules. baaad. Clear rules are much better.
> 
> 6. I completly fail to see what not using levels achieves for us and our 
> sponsors. OTOH, I can see that also sponsors are happy if they see their 
> contribution visible according to their level of contribution.
> 
> 
> Suggested levels:
> 
> label-scheme1 	label-scheme2		amount
> critical	gold-sponsor		>50000 euro
> serious		silver-sponsor		>25000 euro
> important	bronce-sponsor		>10000 euro
> normal		sponsor			> 2000 euro
> minor		supporter		< 2000 euro
> 
> I wouldn't put sponsors below 750 euro on the t-shirt. 
> 
> (And maybe >30000 _GBP_, >15000GBP, >7500GBP, >2500GBP, >1000GBP are better 
> boundaries (for dc7). And 500 GBP minimum to get on the t-shirt.)
> 
> And I don't think it's too late to come up with levels now. IMHO we can do 
> this til the end of february without looking silly, maybe even later.
> 
> I intentionally posted this to -team and not to -sponsors, to make more people 
> aware, that we really need more income. Wanna help (contacting more sponsors)?
> 
> As we have very little sponsorship money at the moment, I'm also thinking of 
> not sponsoring any europeans travelcosts. (And for next year, we should have 
> more categories, not only "I need travel or food+accom sponsorship" but 
> also "I _want_...")
> 

As I already said in IRC (and i think in a previous mail), i like the idea of 
the levels. 
With this system, *ALL* the sponsors are taken into consideration, the
difference is we highlight sponsors who are contributing more. 

Ana


Reply to: