Re: [Debconf-discuss] Gobby vs. Etherpad?
----- Original Message -----
> Le lundi 01 août 2011 à 15:48 -0600, Norman Garcia Aguilar a écrit :
> > On Mon, 1 Aug 2011 11:08:47 +0200
> > Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com> wrote:
> >
> > > [Csillag Tamas]
> > > > Because as far as I see titanpad is a propriatory sw that runs
> > > > on
> > > > someones server. At the same time gobby is installed on debian
> > > > servers so we do not rely on a 3rd party.
> > >
> > > You should look closer, then. Etherpad is free software that can
> > > be
> > > installed on any server. Just use Google to find the source, if
> > > you
> > > do not believe it.
> > >
> > > Anyone else got a good explanation why Gobby is prefered over
> > > Etherpad?
> >
> > I do not know what dependencies has gobby to install on a server,
> > but etherpad needs sun-java6-jdk [0], so i think this could be a
> > good reason to prefer gobby over etherpad.
> It is likely to work with the (free) openjdk too...
Running Etherpad quite fine with OpenJDK.
> Sylvestre
i
--
Igor Galić
Tel: +43 (0) 664 886 22 883
Mail: i.galic@brainsware.org
URL: http://brainsware.org/
GPG: 571B 8B8A FC97 266D BDA3 EF6F 43AD 80A4 5779 3257
Reply to: