Hi. On 25/07/2011 11:15, Holger Levsen wrote: > if you're part of the videoteam and want to help, but can't cause all live > sessions are covered atm, please go a wired connection and review some videos. > We do have reviewing backlog from yesterday and not yet uploaded any videos, > which is something we should fix today! :-) How does this second rating step relate to the first? I.e., we are meant to evaluate just problems that are related to the transcoding, or this must be a complete evaluation of each aspect of the final video? For instance, suppose that that at some point the DV files contains noises caused by feedback or someone touching the microphone: this means that I'll rate a B to the DV file, since the audio is not excellent. But then suppose that the transcoding is excellent: no artifact, very little distortion and so on. Should the transcoded file be rated A or B? Moreover, I suppose that the words "excellent", "good" and "poor" are to be scaled according to the file bitrate, isn't it? Thanks, Gio. -- Giovanni Mascellani <mascellani@poisson.phc.unipi.it> Pisa, Italy Web: http://poisson.phc.unipi.it/~mascellani Jabber: g.mascellani@jabber.org / giovanni@elabor.homelinux.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature