On Mon, 2011-07-04 at 16:38 +0100, Moray Allan wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Ian Jackson
> <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
> > Wot no Condorcet with Schwartz Cloneproof Sequential Dropping ? :-)
>
> "Which of these would you be happy to participate in?" is for me the
> more important question in the survey, above the question about
> people's actual preferences for which something Cordorcet would
> clearly be better.
>
> I just worked within the first/only free-software, free-to-use web
> survey system I found, though. It has some annoying UI points besides
> limitations on question types -- but I'm sure they'll be happy to take
> patches.
<butbutbut>
You missed http://selectricity.org/
http://projects.mako.cc/source/?p=selectricity;a=summary
</butbutbut>
:-)
Andrew.
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
andrew (AT) morphoss (DOT) com +64(272)DEBIAN
Accept people for what they are -- completely unacceptable.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part