[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [Debconf-discuss] Virtualization?



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Hi there,

I'm another attendant interested in virtualization solutions like KVM
and Xen and if you prepare a BoF around this issue I'll join you, sure!

On 08/01/10 20:19, Michael Schultheiss wrote:
> John Goerzen wrote:
>> On 08/01/2010 11:03 AM, Michael Schultheiss wrote:
>>> I propozed a Virtualization BoF but it was rejected from the official
>>> schedule partly due to the lack of a Debian focus in my proposal.  I
>>> wouldn't mind scheduling an ad-hoc Virtualization session.
>>
>> Is it possible to link to the ad-hoc event list from the main schedule 
>> at http://penta.debconf.org/dc10_schedule/index.en.html ?
>>
>> The link, FYI, is:
>>
>> http://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf10/AdHocSessions
> 
> Once scheduled, the ad-hoc events should show up in the schedule.
> 
> I've tentatitively proposed the Virtualization BOF for 2010-08-03 from
> 11:30-12:25 in 414 Schapiro.
> _______________________________________________
> Debconf-discuss mailing list
> Debconf-discuss@lists.debconf.org
> http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-discuss
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
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=P7Yo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply to: