[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [Debconf-discuss] group travel by train to Debconf



[ Adding community@lists.debian.ch as probably some ppl there could be
interested in this. Please follow up on
debconf-discuss@lists.debconf.org. ]

Hi

Sorry for replying so late. I was away over the week-end. I went to the
travel office again today and changed the plan for the trains going
back. I now also plan to travel on Friday. I updated the information on 
http://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/Debconf9/Travel/TrainBooking with the
trains I currently plan to book.

On Sun, May 03, 2009 at 02:10:47AM +0100, Wookey wrote:
> +++ Gaudenz Steinlin [2009-05-02 01:25 +0200]:
> > The train back would be on Thursday 07/30. As far
> > as I understand it, Thursday is the general departure day. Is this
> > correct or does the conference end on Thursday evening and most people are
> > staying until Friday?
> 
> It finishes Thursday evg and most people are leaving on Friday. 

OK, so I'll stay until Friday too, then.
> 
> > To see if there is sufficent interest and when most people want to
> > travel I setup a survey on Doodle. Of course it is also possible to
> > only travel one way with the group. Please fill the survey at the
> > following location if you are interested:
> > http://www.doodle.com/57625rrviyhbg676

There does not seem to be much interst until now. Hopefully now that the
date is more convenient, there will be more interest.

> 
> There seem to to be two options for heading to
> Germany/Switzerland/Austria:
> (the first (via paris) from Bahn.de on the phone, the second (via Barcelona) from bahn.de website):
> 
> Caceres             Fr, 31.07.09  dep 09:25  TLG 197  Talgo
> Madrid-Puerta de A  Fr, 31.07.09  arr 12:51
> Madrid-Chamartin    Fr, 31.07.09  dep 19:00  EN 407   £81 EuroNight Sleeper train
> Paris Austerlitz    Sa, 01.08.09  arr 08:27
> Paris Austerlitz    Sa, 01.08.09  dep 08:27  transfer 40 min. Continue by Metro 5 direction Bobigny
> Paris Est 	    Sa, 01.08.09  arr 09:07
> Paris Est 	    Sa, 01.08.09  dep 09:09  TGV 9553 £36 TGV Subject to compulsory reservation, Bordbistro, special fare
> Mannheim Hbf        Sa, 01.08.09  arr 12:14
> Mannheim Hbf        Sa, 01.08.09  dep 12:31  ICE 595  £33 Intercity-Express Bordrestaurant
> Stuttgart Hbf       Sa, 01.08.09  arr 13:08 
> Stuttgart Hbf       Sa, 01.08.09  dep 13:58  EC 319   Eurocity
> (Onwards to Austria via Salzburg)

I did not choose this train, because if you want to go to Switzerland it
feels a bit akward to go to Paris first. Paris is way to much into the
north...

> 
> Caceres             Fr, 31.07.09  dep 09:25  TLG 197  Talgo
> Madrid-Puerta de A  Fr, 31.07.09  arr 12:51
> Madrid-Puerta de A  Fr, 31.07.09  dep 13:30  AVE 3133 £98 AVE Sleeperette
> Barcelona Sants     Fr, 31.07.09  arr 16:54 	 
> Barcelona Sants     Fr, 31.07.09  dep 17:16  R 15839  £27.50 Regionalzug
> Cerbere             Fr, 31.07.09  arr 20:00 	 
> Cerbere             Fr, 31.07.09  dep 20:42  NZ 4392  £55.50 Nachtzug Couchette train, Subject to compulsory reservation
> Mulhouse Ville 	    Sa, 01.08.09  arr 07:20 	 
> Mulhouse Ville 	    Sa, 01.08.09  dep 07:30  RE 96275 £6 Regional-Express
> Basel SNCF 	    Sa, 01.08.09  arr 07:55
> Basel SBB 	    Sa, 01.08.09  dep 08:14  EC 163 OEC 163   Eurocity
> (Zurich                           dep 09:40)
> (Onwards to Austria via Salzburg)

I added this train to my survey and removed the train leaving on
Thursday.

> 
> £187 madrid->Basel
> 
> The madrid->Barcelona train seems expensive, making this route less attractive (more money, more
> changes, although there is less hanging around in Madrid). Is your option the same as this latter, or
> something different? Will it cost significanly less than GBP 150 (165e)?

This is why the interrail pass is a much better option. If you have an
interrail pass you only have to pay 12€. Madrid - Mulhouse is 131€ then. 

Gaudenz

-- 
Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter.
Try again. Fail again. Fail better.
~ Samuel Beckett ~

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: