Re: [Debconf-discuss] Follow-up: additional checks you can do
On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 11:58:41AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > I'm more in favour of the trouble-maker part. I had a printed copy
> > from Anibal because I was on the road in Mexico prior to DebConf and
> > couldn't make a printout in time. If you would have asked, I would
> > have confirmed you that I had checked the file by the checksum read
> > aloud by Martin. In fact, my paper did even have checkmarks on it.
>
> How do you know the piece pf paper you got came from the file
> whose fingerprint was read? The fact that you are protesting, and yet
> have not provided this critical information, leads one to wonder if
> you actually understand the trusted path issues involved.
that is not relevant. please read Jeroens mail on that subject *much* earlier in this thread.
Reply to: