Re: rename functions as they conflict with glibc

To: cdwrite@other.debian.org
Subject: Re: rename functions as they conflict with glibc
From: Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 17:48:24 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20090615154824.GE23907@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 4a3649cf.qBvj2bjeLnKh8Xaz%Joerg.Schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de>
References: <[🔎] 4A363FF5.1080709@redhat.com> <[🔎] 4a3649cf.qBvj2bjeLnKh8Xaz%Joerg.Schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de>

On Mo, 15 Jun 2009, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> I recommend you to just upgrade to recent original code. Original code is 
> legally distributable and it does implement a workaround for the problem since 

What do Sun's lawyers say to that, and to your cdrecord mixture, about
non-distributability?

Stop FUD.

Best wishes

Norbert

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at>        Vienna University of Technology
Debian Developer <preining@debian.org>                         Debian TeX Group
gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094      fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76  A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BUDE
A polite joke reserved for use in the presence of vicars.
			--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: rename functions as they conflict with glibc
  - From: Joerg.Schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de (Joerg Schilling)

References:
- rename functions as they conflict with glibc
  - From: Roman Rakus <rrakus@redhat.com>
- Re: rename functions as they conflict with glibc
  - From: Joerg.Schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de (Joerg Schilling)

Prev by Date: Re: rename functions as they conflict with glibc
Next by Date: Re: rename functions as they conflict with glibc
Previous by thread: Re: rename functions as they conflict with glibc
Next by thread: Re: rename functions as they conflict with glibc
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread