Re: cdrtools-2.01.01a09 released
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com> wrote:
> FC1 with upgrades, 2.6.15 kernel. And I see it's still trying to convert
> the device name to some pseudo-scsi mumbo-jumbo instead of using the
> standard interface. And still has the "unintentional" warning which
> isn't true because code was added (intentional) to provide support.
If you like to avoid this problem, try to educate the Lunix kernel maintainers
not to stay living in the past....
> Not to worry, I was just hoping that the old last millenium code was
> gone. I am not going to mess with the scsi stuff, I have USB devices
> which may take none to three "busses" in the cdrtool world, meaning I
> have to manually figure the scsi "address" of the device instead of
> using the known name.
USB indeed is a sore point on Linux as USB devices get a new ID everytime they
are replugged. If you like to use USB in a more user friendly way, you still
have the choice to use something different then Linux.
> Not worth debugging, I have solutions but was hoping to use the cdrtools
> code.
Usability only depends on the kernel quality.
If you have problems on Linux, try Solaris, FreeBSD BeOS/Zeta or even MS-WIN
Linux is the only OS around that still suffers from unfixed bugs from the last
millenium when looking at the SCSI transport.
Jörg
--
EMail:joerg@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
js@cs.tu-berlin.de (uni)
schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
Reply to: