Re: startsec problem?
Maik Zumstrull <Maik.Zumstrull@gmx.de> wrote:
> Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > Alexey Toptygin <email@example.com> wrote:
> > > cdrecord: WARNING: Drive returns wrong startsec (0) using -150
> > This is from a buggy firmware.
> Most of the drives I have access to do this.
A drive that makes it wrong will be unable to write a second session
The main problem is that the OP did not yet send any indication on a problem.
> Is the SCSI spec somehow unclear at that point? Why do many
> manufacturers think they should return 0? It's probably intentional,
> given how many drives do it.
Many people from asian locations have problems to read the standard.
EMail:firstname.lastname@example.org (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
email@example.com (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily