Re: blank=all only works in isolation

To: cdwrite@other.debian.org
Subject: Re: blank=all only works in isolation
From: Volker Kuhlmann <hidden@paradise.net.nz>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 16:15:05 +1300
Message-id: <[🔎] 20041021031505.GE6859@paradise.net.nz>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20041020214911.K22755@ada.dhs.org>
References: <[🔎] 20041018205817.3490.qmail@web52105.mail.yahoo.com> <[🔎] 41753494.nailF2J311I8Z@burner> <[🔎] 41765B5F.6010607@tmr.com> <[🔎] 41769F9A.7000205@noblesys.com> <[🔎] 20041020214911.K22755@ada.dhs.org>

> I'd disagree about its validity. Blanking a CDRW disc before
> writing sounded reasonable enough to me.

It doesn't only sound reasonable, it's *necessary*. It's however not
necessary to do a full blank, a partial or quick one is sufficient. 
Blanking and burning with the same cdrecord invocation sounds like a
nifty feature but I've never tried.

Volker

-- 
Volker Kuhlmann			is possibly list0570 with the domain in header
http://volker.dnsalias.net/		Please do not CC list postings to me.

Reply to:

References:
- blank=all only works in isolation
  - From: none none <throw_away_2002@yahoo.com>
- Re: blank=all only works in isolation
  - From: Joerg Schilling <schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de>
- Re: blank=all only works in isolation
  - From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
- Re: blank=all only works in isolation
  - From: "Mike 'Fox' Morrey" <mmorrey@noblesys.com>
- Re: blank=all only works in isolation
  - From: Ambrose Li <acli@ada.dhs.org>

Prev by Date: Re: blank=all only works in isolation
Next by Date: I hope I can rely on you
Previous by thread: Re: blank=all only works in isolation
Next by thread: Re: blank=all only works in isolation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread