Re: DVD+R/+RW compatibility with Windows
> ... using dvd+rw-tools-5.17.4.8.6 ...
> ... with a LiteOn IDE DVD+R/+RW drive.
> ...
> growisofs -dvd-compat -Z /dev/cdrom=/var/backup/backup.udf
>
> At this point, the DVD is readable in the Linux box, but not on Windows,
> even though I used -dvd-compat.
Complement report with dvd+rw-mediainfo outputs for *affected* media.
Not fixed-up, not one that actually fails to play. Then apply
dvd+rw-format -lead-out procedure and compare outputs...
> 3. I use dvd+rw-format to write the lead-out (again?). If the disc is a
> DVD+R, I can't do this step:
> dvd+rw-format -lead-out /dev/cdrom
Correct, dvd+rw-format works exclusively with rewritable media.
> Now the disc is readable on Windows. I thought that step would be
> redundant, because I got the impression that dvd+rw-format -lead-out and
> growisofs -dvd-compat did the same thing.
It takes two to dance tango, doesn't it? In this case these two are
recording program and your unit firmware. One side performs the same pas
at the end, but it does not mean that the other side follows as previous
steps were different:-) I mean your impression is correct, but the
reality is not always what we expect it to be... Do submit
dvd+rw-mediainfo outputs...
> This workaround is fine for DVD+RW's, but I can't use it on DVD+R's, so
> I can't make the more durable, less expensive DVD+R's readable on
> Windows.
Try to record DVD+R without -dvd-compat and then fill it up with
growisofs -M /dev/dvd=/dev/zero...
> Anyone know why I need to write the lead-out
> twice for Windows to see it?
You probably should say "for DVD-ROM unit to see it," not Windows XP:-)
I mean I find it hard to believe that problems you describe have
everything to do with the fact that DVD-ROM unit is under Windows XP
control. Or can you actually confirm that you can access data in similar
DVD-ROM unit connected to Linux? But in either case answer to the
question is most likely "vendor is most likely is the only one who
knows." Did you check for firmware update, by the way? A.
Reply to: