Thanos Kyritsis wrote:
On Tuesday 27 January 2004 20:39, Robert S. Dubinski wrote:The Filesystem Hierarchy Standard document version 2.3 of the Linux Standard Base project (http://www.linuxbase.org/) lists the following:As a matter of fact, there is also this document: http://www.tldp.org/LDP/Linux-Filesystem-Hierarchy/html/usr.html Now, which one is the right one ?? If FHS is the "right" one, it's obvious it's not complete, but on the contrary it's too general and fails to set a suitable standard for modern Linux distros. Well, I think what Joerg wants to say is clear: Some standard needs to finally direct everyone as to where the running kernel sources are. There are many applications that need the running kernel sources and not /usr/include/linux. That's not at all what you need! You need to compile with the headers for the target kernel, where the application will run, not for the host machine. Now in most cases thay are the same, but you will continue to have problems unless you inderstand this point. -- bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com> CTO TMR Associates, Incs not at all what you need, you need the Doing interesting things with small computers since 1979 |