Re: growisofs with -b problem
> > Which kind of tells you that all the mkisofs options need to be after
> > all the growisofs options.
>
> Not 100% true. <mkisofs options> are suggested to be passed last in
> command line mostly for aesthetic reasons. In reality you can actually
> mix them with "native" growisofs options.
You should probably disable that, because one day you might want to use
an option for growisofs which also has meaning for mkisofs (given the
optionitis in mkisofs that's not unlikely).
> One of the practical(!) ideas behind growisofs is to be excused from
> creating intermediate image prior recording.
Yes, that would be nice, but only works with iso9660 as filesystem, and
perhaps with udf, if you're satisfied with what mkisofs -udf produces as
udf.
Volker
--
Volker Kuhlmann is possibly list0570 with the domain in header
http://volker.dnsalias.net/ Please do not CC list postings to me.
Reply to: