Accepted fet 5.22.0-0.1 (source amd64) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2014 19:43:56 +0200
Source: fet
Binary: fet
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 5.22.0-0.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Radu Spineanu <radu@debian.org>
Changed-By: Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@mapreri.org>
Description:
fet - timetable generator
Closes: 718601
Changes:
fet (5.22.0-0.1) unstable; urgency=low
.
[ Mattia Rizzolo ]
* Non-maintainer upload.
* New upstream release 5.22.0. (Closes: #718601)
* debian/control: bump Standards-Version to 3.9.5:
+ debian/rules: add build-arch and build-indep targets.
.
[ Andrea Colangelo ]
* debian/copyright: update.
Checksums-Sha1:
886979df5b9dac540cf3701cca52b7a957df5797 1625 fet_5.22.0-0.1.dsc
95ea444973656af73e767e061e6e7f71b2cfe212 12359282 fet_5.22.0.orig.tar.gz
15537a12f93dc634a302a723210f75c894d0888e 5735 fet_5.22.0-0.1.diff.gz
a8c2e0a21649d40487a0b41b8e94801d5780df62 5068306 fet_5.22.0-0.1_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
393a9c2c1e58b266bbc6050aeda8648b02b0438ef36096120b50b8fe5a12ee22 1625 fet_5.22.0-0.1.dsc
289111a1272198dc47e8bd41dd46547564deacc95ad617799ea5a10cb0739219 12359282 fet_5.22.0.orig.tar.gz
8874be236a451bba7feb101cb6061d54e85bd414a83b56cd98bca61ae71b5e27 5735 fet_5.22.0-0.1.diff.gz
5684ced13de655c7596104bb28929abf7a0555680220a518faa4a0728d217d25 5068306 fet_5.22.0-0.1_amd64.deb
Files:
d48853e3973205f5192bcfe95a982860 5068306 utils optional fet_5.22.0-0.1_amd64.deb
6f9fe986621bca5405cd8107133e614b 1625 utils optional fet_5.22.0-0.1.dsc
d21735880e21d13a886d43bcaa1158de 12359282 utils optional fet_5.22.0.orig.tar.gz
d64a129ac92894d401fe38a7f61cc979 5735 utils optional fet_5.22.0-0.1.diff.gz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=gVFW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: