[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DSA 3252-2] sqlite3 security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-3252-2                   security@debian.org
https://www.debian.org/security/                       Alessandro Ghedini
June 14, 2015                         https://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : sqlite3
CVE ID         : CVE-2015-3416
Debian Bug     : 783968

Michal Zalewski discovered that SQLite3, an implementation of an SQL
database engine, did not properly handle precision and width values
during floating-point conversions, leading to an integer overflow and a
stack-based buffer overflow. This could allow remote attackers to cause
a denial of service (crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact.

Note that this issue had already been fixed for the stable distribution
(jessie) as part of DSA 3252-1.

For the oldstable distribution (wheezy), this problem has been fixed
in version 3.7.13-1+deb7u2.

For the stable distribution (jessie), this problem has been fixed in
version 3.8.7.1-1+deb8u1.

For the testing distribution (stretch), this problem has been fixed
in version 3.8.10.2-1.

For the unstable distribution (sid), this problem has been fixed in
version 3.8.10.2-1.

We recommend that you upgrade your sqlite3 packages.

Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://www.debian.org/security/

Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=75qj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: