Re: decrufting hw-detect?
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 10:20:52PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net> (2014-09-29):
> > Hi all,
> >
> > hw-detect is a package missing in testing for arm64 and ppc64el. It is
> > needed if we want to at least imagine running debian-installer with
> > testing udebs on these architectures.
> >
> > It missed twice the migration to testing due to a new upload, and it
> > seems it won't migrate automatically as it needs a manual decruft from
> > the ftpmasters. The automated cruft script seems to be confused by the
> > old new archdetect-udeb, with some additional provides:
> >
> > | * source package hw-detect version 1.104 no longer builds
> > | binary package(s): archdetect-udeb
> > | on amd64,arm64,armel,armhf,hurd-i386,i386,kfreebsd-amd64,kfreebsd-i386,mips,mipsel,powerpc,ppc64el,s390x,sparc
> > | - suggested command:
> > | dak rm -m "[auto-cruft] NBS (no longer built by hw-detect)" -s unstable -a amd64,arm64,armel,armhf,hurd-i386,i386,kfreebsd-amd64,kfreebsd-i386,mips,mipsel,powerpc,ppc64el,s390x,sparc -p -R -b archdetect-udeb
> > | - broken Depends:
> > | base-installer: bootstrap-base
> > | hw-detect: hw-detect
> > | live-installer: live-installer
> > | partman-base: partman-base
> > | prep-installer: prep-installer [powerpc]
> > | quik-installer: quik-installer [powerpc]
> > | silo-installer: silo-installer [sparc]
> > | yaboot-installer: yaboot-installer [powerpc]
> >
> > Should we ask the ftpmasters for archdetect-udeb to be removed?
>
> I think I did that after having uploaded the revert, but I might be
> misremembering. Either way, I felt uncomfortable with the amount of
> changes/the diff while reviewing udebs this weekend, so I decided to
> skip it.
>
> Feel free to ask for a decruft, I can then get it into testing so that
> new archs get into a better shape, even if that introduces some risks
> for other archs.
I have asked for decruft, and the decruft has been done.
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurelien@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
Reply to: