[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug #737448: Review needed for the Orthanc package



Hi Karsten,

thanks for the ping!

Unfortunately the package does not build in pbuilder.  Sebastien, are you
able to verify this?  Any hint?

Kind regards

        Andreas.

[ 33%] Building CXX object CMakeFiles/CoreLibrary.dir/Core/MultiThreading/BagOfRunnablesBySteps.cpp.o
/usr/bin/c++   -DBOOST_FILESYSTEM_VERSION=3 -DBOOST_HAS_FILESYSTEM_V3=1 -DBOOST_HAS_LOCALE=0 -DDCMTK_DICTIONARY_DIR=\"/usr/share/libdcmtk2\" -DDCMTK_USE_EMBEDDED_DICTIONARIES=0 -DDCMTK_VERSION_NUMBER=360 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H=1 -DNO_SSL_DL=1 -DORTHANC_BUILD_UNIT_TESTS=1 -DORTHANC_SSL_ENABLED=1 -DORTHANC_STANDALONE=1 -DORTHANC_STATIC=0 -DORTHANC_VERSION=\"0.7.3\" -DUNIT_TESTS_WITH_HTTP_CONNEXIONS=0 -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE=1 -g -O2 -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat -Werror=format-security -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2  -Wall -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -I/tmp/buildd/orthanc-0.7.3+dfsg/Build/AUTOGENERATED -I/usr/include/dcmtk/config -I/usr/include/dcmtk/dcmdata -I/usr/include/dcmtk/dcmimage -I/usr/include/dcmtk/dcmimgle -I/usr/include/dcmtk/dcmjpeg -I/usr/include/dcmtk/dcmnet -I/usr/include/dcmtk/dcmpstat -I/usr/include/dcmtk/dcmqrdb -I/usr/include/dcmtk/dcmsign -I/usr/include/dcmtk/dcmsr -I/usr/include/dcmtk/dcmtls -I/usr/include/dcmtk/ofstd -I/usr/include/dcmtk -I/tmp/buildd/orthanc-0.7.3+dfsg/Build/mongoose -I/usr/include/jsoncpp -I/usr/include/lua5.1 -I/usr/src/gtest -I/tmp/buildd/orthanc-0.7.3+dfsg/OrthancCppClient/SharedLibrary/Laaw    -o CMakeFiles/CoreLibrary.dir/Core/MultiThreading/BagOfRunnablesBySteps.cpp.o -c /tmp/buildd/orthanc-0.7.3+dfsg/Core/MultiThreading/BagOfRunnablesBySteps.cpp
In file included from /usr/include/boost/atomic.hpp:12:0,
                 from /usr/include/boost/thread/pthread/once_atomic.hpp:20,
                 from /usr/include/boost/thread/once.hpp:20,
                 from /usr/include/boost/thread.hpp:17,
                 from /tmp/buildd/orthanc-0.7.3+dfsg/Core/MultiThreading/BagOfRunnablesBySteps.cpp:36:
/usr/include/boost/atomic/atomic.hpp:202:16: error: 'uintptr_t' was not declared in this scope
 typedef atomic<uintptr_t> atomic_uintptr_t;
                ^
/usr/include/boost/atomic/atomic.hpp:202:25: error: template argument 1 is invalid
 typedef atomic<uintptr_t> atomic_uintptr_t;
                         ^
/usr/include/boost/atomic/atomic.hpp:202:43: error: invalid type in declaration before ';' token
 typedef atomic<uintptr_t> atomic_uintptr_t;
                                           ^
make[3]: *** [CMakeFiles/CoreLibrary.dir/Core/MultiThreading/BagOfRunnablesBySteps.cpp.o] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/orthanc-0.7.3+dfsg/Build'
make[2]: *** [CMakeFiles/CoreLibrary.dir/all] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/orthanc-0.7.3+dfsg/Build'
make[1]: *** [all] Error 2

On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:17:41AM +0100, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> Any chance someone could look at this ?
> 
> Thanks,
> Karsten
> 
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:22:12AM +0100, Sebastien Jodogne wrote:
> 
> > Following the release of the new upstream version 0.7.3 of Orthanc, I
> > have tried and fix the bug #737448 of the Orthanc package
> > ("Sourceless file (minified)") [1].
> > 
> > Please someone could review the current version of the package [2] to
> > make sure that the reported problem is properly fixed? Thanks you
> > much in advance!
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Sébastien-
> > 
> > 
> > [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=737448
> > [2] http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/debian-med/trunk/packages/orthanc/trunk/debian/
> 
> -- 
> GPG key ID E4071346 @ gpg-keyserver.de
> E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD  4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> Archive: [🔎] 20140227091741.GC4804@hermes.hilbert.loc">https://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 20140227091741.GC4804@hermes.hilbert.loc
> 
> 

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


Reply to: