lsb-discuss Mar 2001 by author

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[Thread Index] [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Andreas Jaeger

Undecided Interfaces Mar 07
Re: Undecided Interfaces Mar 07
Included Interfaces Without Standards [ISO C 99] Mar 08

Chmouel Boudjnah

Re: Versions of stty Mar 01

Christopher Yeoh

Re: Versions of chfn Mar 08
Re: Versions of chfn Mar 08
command conflicts between FHS 2.2 beta and LSB specification Mar 14

Daniel Quinlan

New LSB Chairman Mar 09
Re: command conflicts between FHS 2.2 beta and LSB specification Mar 14

gk4

Re: Versions of chfn Mar 08
Re: Versions of chfn Mar 08
We need you for the LSB v0.7.1 R-E-V-I-E-W Mar 26
Re: We need you for the LSB v0.7.1 R-E-V-I-E-W Mar 26

internettv

Vestel ' den Ayin Urunleri Mar 15

ISHIKAWA Mutsumi

Re: We need you for the LSB v0.7.1 R-E-V-I-E-W Mar 26

Jimmy Richards

Re: We need you for the LSB v0.7.1 R-E-V-I-E-W Mar 26

Johannes Poehlmann

Re: Versions of chfn Mar 08
Re: command conflicts between FHS 2.2 beta and LSB specification Mar 14
Re: Caldera claims "LSB 1.0 implementation" in Project 42 beta announcement Mar 14
first Release of LSB implementation Mar 28

Lenz Grimmer

Re: Fonts in the LSB? Mar 05

Matt Taggart

Fonts in the LSB? Mar 01

Matt Wilson

building appcheck requires C99 Mar 01
Re: building appcheck requires C99 Mar 01
devchk: stdlib_h.c checks internal drand48_data struct members Mar 01
devchk makes assumptions on sizeof void* Mar 01
oh. the sizeof() problem is worse than I thougt Mar 01
exclude GLX symbols Mar 01
Re: exclude GLX symbols Mar 01
Re: building appcheck requires C99 Mar 01
Re: exclude GLX symbols Mar 01
struct msgbuf is not needed and should be excluded Mar 01
Re: oh. the sizeof() problem is worse than I thougt Mar 01
Re: oh. the sizeof() problem is worse than I thougt Mar 06
soname of libGL needs fixing Mar 08
Caldera claims "LSB 1.0 implementation" in Project 42 beta announcement Mar 13

Me

Re: We need you for the LSB v0.7.1 R-E-V-I-E-W Mar 27

mk832mn57

. Mar 26

Raja Srinivasan

RE: Caldera claims "LSB 1.0 implementation" in Project 42 beta announcement Mar 14

Ralf Flaxa

Re: Caldera claims "LSB 1.0 implementation" in Project 42 beta announcement Mar 14

Ralph Mellor \(ralphat dimpdotcom\)

Re: We need you for the LSB v0.7.1 R-E-V-I-E-W Mar 26

Scott McNeil

Re: Caldera claims "LSB 1.0 implementation" in Project 42 beta announcement Mar 14
FSG/LDPS/LSB/FHS & George Kraft on ./ Mar 14
Re: Caldera claims "LSB 1.0 implementation" in Project 42 beta announcement Mar 15

Stuart Anderson

Re: building appcheck requires C99 Mar 01
Re: oh. the sizeof() problem is worse than I thougt Mar 01
Re: exclude GLX symbols Mar 01
Re: exclude GLX symbols Mar 01
Re: exclude GLX symbols Mar 01
Re: exclude GLX symbols Mar 01
Re: oh. the sizeof() problem is worse than I thougt Mar 02
Re: exclude GLX symbols Mar 02
Re: oh. the sizeof() problem is worse than I thougt Mar 06
Re: Undecided Interfaces Mar 07
Re: soname of libGL needs fixing Mar 08
Re: ncurses specification Mar 12
Re: ncurses specification Mar 12
Re: command conflicts between FHS 2.2 beta and LSB specification Mar 14
Re: command conflicts between FHS 2.2 beta and LSB specification Mar 14
Re: We need you for the LSB v0.7.1 R-E-V-I-E-W Mar 26

SuperTicket

Uçak biletlerinizi almadan... Mar 22

Thomas Dickey

Re: ncurses specification Mar 05

Thomas E. Dickey

Re: ncurses specification Mar 12

Todd Lukes

RE: command conflicts between FHS 2.2 beta and LSB specification Mar 14

vente

Go4job.net, la plus grande banque d'emplois au Québec Mar 14

Wichert Akkerman

Re: command conflicts between FHS 2.2 beta and LSB specification Mar 14
Re: command conflicts between FHS 2.2 beta and LSB specification Mar 14

zx11zx14

There yours for FREE! Mar 02
There yours for FREE! Mar 02

The last update was on 23:00 GMT Fri Mar 07. There are 69 messages. Page 1 of 1.

[previous month]

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mail converted by MHonArc