Does anybody know of the original motivations to have dpkg and apt.
Does anybody know the original motivations for having dpkg and the
apt. I do remember reading somewhere that Ian Murdock had some issues with rpm
(urpmi or whatever it was called circa '93-'94) either with dependency
conflict resolution or/and the updates/upgrades.
My google fu is not good at finding things which are over 10 years old
so any help would be appreciated. I want to use the info. for a
presentation. The historical reference of dpkg in wikipedia is pretty
weak https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dpkg#History as it does not delve
why they wanted or had to use dpkg . I am not looking for dpkg vs rpm
or anything like that but more for understanding the reasons behind
it. Also want to use it in a presentation so people are aware of the
For my part I did look at /usr/share/doc/dpkg as well
/usr/share/doc/apt as tried to
parse the listing of dpkg -L $packagename to see if there are any obvious
entries which tell about the early history of dpkg/apt but was unable to
see/grep the same.
Any help on the same would be appreciated. I would also attempt to add
any info. to the wiki article as well so the next person does not have
to go through the same route.
Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल
My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0
065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17