Re: solaris compile fixes

To: Adam Heath <doogie@debian.org>
Cc: deity@lists.debian.org, Nils Lohner <lohner@debian.org>
Subject: Re: solaris compile fixes
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ualberta.ca>
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 1999 14:05:44 -0700 (MST)
Message-id: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.991209140528.5211f-100000@wakko.deltatee.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.991209123032.13277d-100000@doogie.private.novare.net>

On Thu, 9 Dec 1999, Adam Heath wrote:

> I would say this patch should pretty much explain itself.  I see no reason why
> it shouldn't be applied.

Yes.. That looks sane - in cvs

Jason

Reply to:

References:
- solaris compile fixes
  - From: Adam Heath <doogie@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Real build problems on solaris; make problem fixed
Next by Date: Re: build problem on solaris
Previous by thread: solaris compile fixes
Next by thread: apt-get works on solaris
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread