Re: apt-https pre-final

To: Tomas Pospisek <tpo@sourcepole.ch>
Cc: APT Development Team <deity@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: apt-https pre-final
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@debian.org>
Date: Sun, 02 Jun 2002 23:49:40 -0600 (MDT)
Message-id: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.1020602234028.11118F-100000@wakko.debian.net>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0205221727470.15134-100000@tpo2.sourcepole>

On Fri, 24 May 2002, Tomas Pospisek wrote:

> OK, apt-https is done, documented, working and everything. It's can
> authenticate too. It's against 0.5.4,  not against CVS.

Please do one against CVS, your diff has all sorts of weirdness in the
.sgml documents that looks like a mismatched version or something..

The openssl license means you can't use pure GPL on the bits you have
applied copyright too..

I'm feeling slight amounts of uncertainty about including large swacks of
ssl-tunnel, especially since I'm sure people will file lots of bugs
against it :<

Jason

-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deity-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: apt-https pre-final
  - From: Tomas Pospisek <tpo_deb@sourcepole.ch>

Prev by Date: Re: Bug#148834: apt: Problem with problem solver
Next by Date: Processed: your mail
Previous by thread: Re: Bug#148336: apt: problem solver wants to remove frozen-bubble
Next by thread: Re: apt-https pre-final
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread