[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r372 - trunk/debian



El Martes, 19 de Julio de 2005 14:20, David Nusinow escribió:
> Because the first priority is to get the thing to build on all arches.
> These stupid MANIFEST changes are something you only really have to do
> once, but they need to be done to unblock a lot of things.

	:-) All right, all right. I know that you are in a hurry to build X.Org in 
all the architectures, but there are another bug:

SPARC:
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=xorg-x11&ver=6.8.2.dfsg.1-3&arch=sparc&stamp=1121723761&file=log&as=raw

Dies with:
In file included from /usr/include/asm/fbio.h:8,
                 from xf86Sbus.h:31,
                 from xf86Configure.c:51:
/usr/include/asm-sparc/fbio.h:58: error: syntax error before '*' token
/usr/include/asm-sparc/fbio.h:59: error: syntax error before '*' token
/usr/include/asm-sparc/fbio.h:60: error: syntax error before '*' token
/usr/include/asm-sparc/fbio.h:61: error: syntax error before '}' token
/usr/include/asm-sparc/fbio.h:100: error: field 'cmap' has incomplete type
make[7]: *** [xf86Configure.o] Error 1
make[7]: Leaving directory 
`/build/buildd/xorg-x11-6.8.2.dfsg.1/build-tree/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/common'


	I have not had time to search more information about this subject.

> > > -* Drop the Debian woody->sarge transitional packages:
> > > -  + xlibmesa3
> > > -  + xlibmesa3-dbg
> > > -  + xlibmesa-dev
> > > -  + xlibs-dbg
> > > -  + xlibs-dev
> > > -  + xlibs-pic
> > > -
> >
> > 	This is not yet done. I do not see the point of removing it.
>
> These xlibmesa packages are gone and I haven't decided what to do about
> xlibs-* yet. Transitioning the whole archive off them will take an enormous
> amount of work that's not that critical right now. Maybe for the modular
> tree, but I don't think that should be on the TODO list for the monolithic
> tree at all.

	I think so. It is very 'silly' (sorry if this sounds harsh, I do not know any 
other word in English softer than silly), in my humble opinion to have 
separate packages for *everything*  and not use that separation in the 
development packages. It pushes less load on the whole system (you only use 
whatever you need): users and builders. And all these xlibs-* packages are, 
as stated, for transitioning purposes.

	Obviously it is going to make half of the distribution FTBFS, but unstable is 
*now* half-frozen...it is time to change, IMO. Reorganization of packages is 
hard, all of us know that, and I understand that it is not for maybe -4 or 
even -5, but it deserves a line in the TODO, because it is work to do. :-) 
Hide it won't do it.

	Best regards,


		Ender.
-- 
Oh, I saw...Very American. Fire enough bullets and hope
 they hit the target!
		-- Allan Quatermain (The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen).
--
Debian developer

Attachment: pgpJlCMAVfdaS.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: