On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 03:49:05PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote: > On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 01:44:42AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 02:32:47PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 10:57:06PM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin wrote: > > > > Update the extended descriptions of packages that depend on cpp-3.2 to > > > > explain why they use cpp in general, and why cpp-3.2 in particular. > > > > > > That must be why you told me on IRC to revert #521. :P > > > > I don't know what you're talking about. It doesn't appear to have ever > > been reverted. > > #522. Huh, well, they seem to have been un-reverted at some point, somehow. Anyway, I don't remember what I told you in IRC, but it's possible I've since changed my mind. Until recently I thought that this was a bug known to GCC upstream that would be promptly fixed. I was quite clearly dead wrong about *that*. :-P -- G. Branden Robinson | I had thought very carefully about Debian GNU/Linux | committing hara-kiri over this, but branden@debian.org | I overslept this morning. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Toshio Yamaguchi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature