[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#166413: mga driver doesn't set gamma on second screen



On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 02:53:35PM -0500, 166413@bugs.debian.org wrote:
> Okay, I'm getting frustrated with you Matrox guys.

Hopefully this message will clear the air.

<snip>

> Brett Carter says:
> "After a quick reboot to windows, looks like the results are the same
> there - you can't set the gamma on the second head."

To clarify:  Both in windows 98SE and X setting the gamma only sets it
on the primary display.  It looks to me like the hardware is crippled.
I'll send a message to matrox tech support and see if they indeed can
confirm this.

> Given all this contradiction, I'm making the following decree:
> 
> * Brett Carter is the bug submitter.  He is willing and able to see if
>   he can reproduce this on his specific hardware.  Maybe he is using a
>   Matrox card that can't set gamma on the secondary head.  If so, this
>   is not a bug.  Brett, can you confirm this?

Yes, I :cannot: set the gamma on the secondary head either in windows or
X.  I even flashed my card to the latest bios and driver under windows
just to make sure.  Go ahead and close this report as "not a bug".

> * If someone has a Matrox card that *can* set the gamma on the second
>   head, file a separate report.
>
> Brett has a Matrox MGA G400 AGP rev 130.  That is the only model of card
> that matters for this report.

Umm, actually I've got a matrox G450 - their similar, but slightly
different.  Looks like linux's pci database needs to be updated, and
lspci on my box returns:
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Matrox Graphics, Inc. MGA G400 AGP (rev 82)

But I know for a fact I've got a g450 (at least that's what the box
says, and what windows reports).  I'm running 2.4.18 so maybe this is
reported correctly in a newer kernel.  AFIK the g400 isn't even a
dual-head card.  

So to sum things up:
1. On a matrox G450, it looks like you can't set gamma on the secondary
head due to a hardware limitation.
2. This bug can be closed as "not a bug"
3. It looks like there still might be an issue with the g400, which to
my knowledge isn't a dual head card.
-Brett Carter

Attachment: pgpv7UENMnZJd.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: