Re: A Radeon and X question, probably not Debian specific
On Wed, 2002-07-24 at 20:39, Jeff Lessem wrote:
> "Charl P. Botha" <c.p.botha@its.tudelft.nl> writes:
>
> > I had a look at your X output and all seems fine. How many FPS does
> > glxgears yield? You have to run it for at least 5 seconds before it outputs
> > something to stdout.
>
> glxgears, in its default small size is about 500 fps, expanding the
> window to full screen gets me 25 fps. Xscreensaver's gears hack gets
> about 5 fps running full screen.
The size of the latter's window doesn't seem to impact the framerate here,
so that sounds like software rendering.
> On the advice of Michel Dänzer (thanks!) I added the debian dri-trunk
> stuff, and got that working easily enough with the 1.4.0 20020714
> Radeon drm driver, but it didn't make any difference. Everything
> appears to be working correctly, but gl stuff is very slow. The only
> error I get is [drm:radeon_freelist_get] *ERROR* returning NULL!
> output from the drm driver.
That on the other hand only appears with direct rendering...
Does running a client with LIBGL_DEBUG=verbose give any more interesting
info as to whether you're actually using direct rendering?
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer
XFree86 and DRI project member / CS student, Free Software enthusiast
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: