Re: Inclusion in the Debian consultant list
Hi Luca,
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 02:09:43PM +0100, Luca Capello wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Nov 2012 20:48:27 +0100, Simon Paillard wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 08:34:50PM +0100, Luca Capello wrote:
> >> On Wed, 07 Nov 2012 18:22:48 +0100, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> >> > On Ma, 06 nov 12, 11:28:49, Luca Capello wrote:
> >> >> Any news about it? Feel free to ask for any help, I am part of the
> >> >> Debian Events Team and thus I have already access to webwml.
[..]
> > The mail setup is way uglier (/org/www.debian.org/mail/.mailfilter on
> > www-master), on which email do you want to receive consultants mails (and
> > spams) ?
>
> $ ssh gismo@www-master.debian.org
> Permission denied (publickey).
$ ldapsearch -H ldap://db.debian.org -LLL -b "dc=debian,dc=org" -x host=wolkenstein allowedGroups
dn: host=wolkenstein,ou=hosts,dc=debian,dc=org
allowedGroups: debwww
allowedGroups: mirroradm
allowedGroups: press
> Anyway, please use my personal email address, the one I am writing from.
Done.
> > Don't you think we should move that to a wiki page so that people add
> > themselves ?
>
> Exactly because the wiki page is not under our control, I do not
> consider it official.
What is the point of an official list of consultants while we cannot asset at
all skills of that consultant ?
> > While we can filter vendors that do not sell the last Debian version, there is
> > little added value in manual processing of consultants.
>
> I disagree with any automatic addition to www.d.o, which means that IMHO
> manual processing is always required for consultants/vendors/events/...
While events/vendors have metrics that allow moderation (does the vendor still
sells up to date Debian), I still wonder what type of moderation can be applied
to consultants beside spam filtering.
--
Simon Paillard
Reply to: