Re: Bug#640737: [copyright-format] misc. changes from driver.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
Le 26/09/2011 12:05, Russ Allbery a écrit :
> Bill Allombert <Bill.Allombert@math.u-bordeaux1.fr> writes:
>> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 09:31:47AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>
>>> I think that we need to resolve #640737 first. The most frequently
>>> proposed URL,
>>> ‘http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/’;
>>> (with the slash at the end) looks safe, but I would feel more
>>> comfortable if we had more feedback on both the debian-policy and
>>> debian-www lists.
>> I do not see any policy-related objection. I hope the debian-www team
>> can confirm that this URL is available.
>
> Yup, this looks good to me as well (with or without the packaging-manuals
> component as debian-www would prefer).
On the debian-www side, keeping the packaging-manuals component seems
right: it's the canonical path [1] for the policy related documents (by
the way, the packaging tutorial should probably better suited within the
manuals path [2]: Lucas, is it OK for you? If so, I'll prepare the move
and a redirection from the current URL, please reply only to debian-www
for this side issue in order not to spam this bug log).
1: http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/
2: http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/
I don't now what is the supposed name of the DEP5 document inside the
debian-policy package, but it would be highly appreciated if the “1.0”
part could be easily parsable from the document name, at worse from the
document itself (in a reliable way).
Another side issue: in a few years, after some updates of the
copyright-format policy (e.g. version 4.2), it will be a bit painful to
rebuild the website from scratch, since one will have to dig up old
debian-policy packages in order to retrieve all copyright-format versions…
Regards
David
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)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=+LLM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: