[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Error message for Tidy too (was: Validation of webwml pages)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Hi,

  Since we recently get rid of all Tidy errors and warnings [0], why not
send a “Tidy failed” mail (à la “Validation failed”) in order to keep it
that way? Since there might be duplicates, I propose to send the “Tidy
failed” mail if and only if no “Validation failed” mail were sent (the
other option would be to aggregate both in one mail, but there might be
duplicates inside the mail).

  0: http://www-master.debian.org/build-logs/tidy/

  Do you have any comment or other suggestion about it (the lack of
answer will be considered as a formal acknowledgement, and I'm going to
prepare and test this feature right now ;-).

  Please note that in order to make those files really empty, I ruled
out the “nested q elements” warnings. If you relied on this feature,
I'll push these warnings back, and will only rule them out before mailing.

Le 06/04/2011 15:34, David Prévot a écrit :

> Since I didn't update this thread, but as you may already have notice,
> the “annoy translators on validation error” script is run daily, and a
> weekly mail for every language that still fails the validation is sent
> to the persons listed for the “en” language. When a language is failing
> the validation, I add the person who introduced the error to the list of
> recipients instead of fixing the error myself, considering that it's best
> to let translator fix the error since it might hide other problems I may
> miss.
> 
> If you wish to add yourself or update recipients for your language ,
> you're welcome to update the english/devel/website/validation.data file.

Regards

David

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJNxAUaAAoJELgqIXr9/gny/CcP/0Tr/byiD1GjCPYQr+2A5EZH
zBUYlnN5K++AIioopueeVmDqiut1xRZBJSRThByH4Na27kXty7FG2fDH7lgp63SG
uyaPpQAovleenRBmMnLwfMl+LxSGTm8sOSobCw33m9gV4shYylHJPqzvXxSWlS/J
3ILTg1RtrzPPL23LbXcaAeVq6lfr7rgOolCR5/sCuO6octIJhheXXEXc+l69a1dj
coweEoIXK+0XxvYXyV1EfY+r0/NWNxCqEgrtJXgFinsldpCp8irfkh3ISg0aHgW3
NNUMhR/8Q02003jHjGuOkYobWPLClNFE4G6dsptv26SDsHi7ahClIW5/kBGjgu/i
KqhJB9XMvzTn0RErQ4xOWQ2U0VGC0om04l7YqdBGSWa6TddvFZWGOcEARQ3FQh5I
5ERayk/7EE1cXfg9bifyjct1FjfILE5Zo2WQvdIFvMc5qm+zoAhT985Uav1XFyiO
943jtAAnt6yIBJ2QADLRfjkkNwBw/L2Orxy+FaXkJobQjOdkaJ7QB+Yp0zqlsBzC
2pu0qqv/lFh6fysapBMaqAZu9Rtm4z6TjogTQ8Cjfkrx58BSr8qmNgw9Gd4Ks4Zj
Jnj93cmWITDTJdfafiu702v/EZ7qkJ8O9dVwyjHNs4zzd3VbwchyhGl55Q42Ci6T
fx6zd8QH0Ia17u94Ljms
=G0Ez
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: