[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#613978: www.debian.org: Please add the overall BTS bug count graph on the BTS "home" page



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Hi Mike,

Le 18/02/2011 12:29, Mike Hommey a écrit :

> The BTS graphs on qa.debian.org now have an overall BTS bug count graph,
> which I think would be nice to put on http://www.debian.org/Bugs/:
> 
> http://qa.debian.org/data/bts/graphs/all.png

Thanks a lot for the graphs and the idea to make this one available on
the website. While testing the results, I was told that the image was a
bit huge, and I tend to agree (width > 800px), and tried an easy fix
(resize the graph by the browser, cf. following patch and on line [1] if
my ISP is kind enough to not break my connexion), but the result,
especially the text, is blur.

Could you please provide a similar graph with a width ~ 600px? Note that
we could also link this shorter image to the big one, or something more
accurate eventually (your blog post [2] maybe, or a more “official”
howto about those graphs).

[1] http://www.tilapin.org/debian/Bugs/index.en
[2] http://glandium.org/blog/?p=1817

Cheers

David

Index: english/Bugs/index.wml
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/webwml/webwml/english/Bugs/index.wml,v
retrieving revision 1.75
diff -u -r1.75 index.wml
- --- english/Bugs/index.wml      5 Apr 2011 18:32:14 -0000       1.75
+++ english/Bugs/index.wml      18 Apr 2011 23:32:26 -0000
@@ -24,6 +24,12 @@

 <h2>Viewing bug reports on the WWW</h2>

+<p style="text-align:center">
+<img src="http://qa.debian.org/data/bts/graphs/all.png";
+height="290" width="646"
+alt="Bug count for all" />
+</p>
+
 <p>Find a bug by <strong>number</strong>:
   <br />
   <a name="bugreport"></a>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
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=C+vV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: