Bug#614111: marked as done (packages.d.o: theme regression: table of binpkgs by architecture (colours, layout))
Your message dated Mon, 7 Mar 2011 21:16:02 +0100
with message-id <20110307201602.GA13390@violet>
and subject line Re: Bug#614111: packages.d.o: theme regression: table of binpkgs by architecture (colours, layout)
has caused the Debian Bug report #614111,
regarding packages.d.o: theme regression: table of binpkgs by architecture (colours, layout)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact email@example.com
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact firstname.lastname@example.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
I noticed a regression (actually two) in the list of binary pak-
kages per architecture, for example on this page:
It looks like this in Lynx (good):
Debian -- Details of package kdelibs5-dev in sid (p16 of 17)
CAPTION: Download for all available architectures
Architecture Version Package Size Installed Size Files
amd64 4:4.4.5-3 1,791.6 kB 8676 kB [list of files]
armel 4:4.4.5-3 1,825.7 kB 13596 kB [list of files]
hurd-i386 4:4.4.5-3 1,774.8 kB 13588 kB [list of files]
i386 4:4.4.5-3 1,830.4 kB 13612 kB [list of files]
ia64 4:4.4.5-3 1,842.4 kB 34032 kB [list of files]
kfreebsd-amd64 4:4.4.5-3+b1 1,835.8 kB 10750 kB [list of files]
kfreebsd-i386 4:4.4.5-3+b1 1,829.7 kB 10670 kB [list of files]
m68k (unofficial port) 4:4.2.2-2 1,555.8 kB 12020 kB [list of files]
mips 4:4.4.5-3 1,839.5 kB 13776 kB [list of files]
mipsel 4:4.4.5-3 1,832.4 kB 13776 kB [list of files]
powerpc 4:4.4.5-3 1,837.4 kB 13664 kB [list of files]
powerpcspe (unofficial port) 4:4.4.5-1 1,832.0 kB 13640 kB [list of files]
s390 4:4.4.5-3 1,795.4 kB 13664 kB [list of files]
sh4 (unofficial port) 4:4.4.5-3 1,843.4 kB 13636 kB [list of files]
sparc 4:4.4.5-3 1,835.1 kB 13644 kB [list of files]
sparc64 (unofficial port) 4:4.4.5-3 1,840.4 kB 13724 kB [list of files]
This page is also available in the following languages (How to set the default document language):
Български (Bəlgarski) Deutsch suomi français magyar 日本語 (Nihongo)
Nederlands Русский (Russkij) slovensky svenska українська (ukrajins'ka) 中文
(Zhongwen,简) 中文 (Zhongwen,繁)
As for colours (in Lynx): architecture names are green,
"(unofficial port)" is red, "4:4.4.5-1" and "4:4.2.2-2"
are white (old/outdated versions, no distinction between
older Debian release and older upstream version but that
never was, in Lynx) and "4:4.4.5-3" and "4:4.4.5-3+b1"
are blue (version OK, including binNMU – no regression).
But in Opera (9.27 qt3-static i386-linux on MirBSD) there
are line breaks in "(unofficial\nport)" and "list of\nfiles"
which makes the entire subtable double-spaced. Furthermore,
all version fields are no longer colourised (in fact, the
entire table is black (links blue/underlined) on white).
This *is* a regression.
Judging from the fact that it looks the same as before the
Theme change in Lynx (good) I’d guess that, for the colours,
some CSS is missing, and for the line breaks, the subtable
width is limited (its width in Opera is about 70% of the
screen width of 1024px, and it shrinks with the browser
window, so this is probably a CSS problem as well).
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5+m68k.5-atari
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/mksh-static
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 08:10:04PM +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> I noticed a regression (actually two) in the list of binary pak-
> kages per architecture, for example on this page:
> ‣ http://packages.debian.org/sid/kdelibs5-dev
> But in Opera (9.27 qt3-static i386-linux on MirBSD) there
> are line breaks in "(unofficial\nport)" and "list of\nfiles"
> which makes the entire subtable double-spaced. Furthermore,
> all version fields are no longer colourised (in fact, the
> entire table is black (links blue/underlined) on white).
> This *is* a regression.
As discussed on IRC, this is fixed now. Thanks for bringing this up.
--- End Message ---