Re: debconf10 is _11th_ debian conference
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Le 21/08/2010 12:00, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl a écrit :
> Hi!
>
> * Hideki Yamane <henrich@debian.or.jp> [100821 08:15]:
>>> Can the decision be evaluated again now that feedback is coming in
>>> about the confusion on a to some degree regular basis - or at least can
>>> we get an argumentation line on why we are actively hiding the existence
>>> of a debconf for the benefit of reducing numbering confusion?
> [..]
>> Anyway, "Tenth Annual Debian Developer Conference" in news page is wrong,
>> please remove "tenth" or change it to "Eleventh".
>
> Sorry, no. Feel free to do decide whatever for future conference, but
> the current webpage is an announcement that has been sent out the way it
> is.
There is no point in keeping false affirmation on the website: it's OK
to make mistake when writing an announcement in the hurry, anyway the
message is stored in the mailing list archive, but there is no need to
keep mistakes in the website.
I was about to commit the following change :
s/Tenth Annual Debian Developer Conf/2010 Annual Debian Conf/
(or maybe "The 2010 Annual Debian Conference", not sure for "The",
please comment) as it sounded like a good idea and no one speak against
this idea until now :
[🔎] 201008161217.32899.holger@layer-acht.org">http://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 201008161217.32899.holger@layer-acht.org
Please, add comment on this thread in hope we reach a consensus on this
one and go on with other interesting stuff ;-).
Cheers
David
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkxwBFMACgkQ18/WetbTC/q9mQCgg5RXqPpgOe/Hfav9ykzSLFjT
TrEAn0pXe6SUHV95aeJnXZQKOUrSQzph
=I3Uc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: