Your message dated Mon, 9 Aug 2010 16:06:05 +0200 with message-id <20100809140605.GC12835@upsilon.cc> and subject line Re: [Debconf-team] Bug#592170: please add debconf delegates to intro/organisation has caused the Debian Bug report #592170, regarding please add debconf delegates to intro/organisation to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 592170: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=592170 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: please add debconf delegates to intro/organisation
- From: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>
- Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2010 19:24:27 -0400
- Message-id: <[🔎] 201008071924.33944.holger@layer-acht.org>
package: www.debian.org severity: wishlist x-debbugs-cc: debconf-team@lists.debconf.org, dpl@debian.org, aj@azure.humbug.org.au Hi, please add DebConf and its Debian delegates somehow to http://www.debian.org/intro/organization It's currently a bit unclear who the delegates are (and the delegation from 2006 should IMO be reviewed and renewed anyway), so for the moment this bug report should serve as a reminder to resolv this. Marga remembered that she, Ganneff and me (and probably others (*)) were delegates, but I couldnt find such a mail from aj to d-d-a now, which is no surprise to me, given that DebConf has just ended. I could only find aj's statement in my AM report saying "Formal acceptance as a developer will allow Holger to [...] be more officially involved in DebConf organisation as a formal delegate should that be useful". cheers, HolgerAttachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Anthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au>
- Cc: Michael Schultheiss <schultmc@debconf.org>, Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>, 592170-done@bugs.debian.org, debconf-team@lists.debconf.org
- Subject: Re: [Debconf-team] Bug#592170: please add debconf delegates to intro/organisation
- From: Stefano Zacchiroli <leader@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 16:06:05 +0200
- Message-id: <20100809140605.GC12835@upsilon.cc>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] AANLkTin59AWgdE6hXiFhHK-afEXD2wcVu1q64JJy-hs+@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <[🔎] 201008071924.33944.holger@layer-acht.org> <[🔎] 20100808005811.GO9743@cartman.hq.amellus.com> <[🔎] AANLkTin59AWgdE6hXiFhHK-afEXD2wcVu1q64JJy-hs+@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 12:46:17AM -0400, Anthony Towns wrote: > Technically that was restricted to a venue decision for 2007 and was > revoked later anyway [0] as part of making the decision using public > criteria and an open IRC discussion (which aiui has only improved > since). Thanks for following up with this information! Given that the delegation was revoked, I'm now closing this bug report. > Personally, I'd suggest just getting Stefano to do a new > delegation of some active/key debconf people and ignore the old stuff. Agreed, and the debconf-team people who attended the "debian vs debconf" BoF should already know that I'm positive about that. I guess the issue now is identifying the candidates for the delegation; it should probably be postponed to the "debian vs debconf" discussion which is planned for September. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7 zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/ Dietro un grande uomo c'è ..| . |. Et ne m'en veux pas si je te tutoie sempre uno zaino ...........| ..: |.... Je dis tu à tous ceux que j'aimeAttachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---