Your message dated Sun, 1 Nov 2009 22:41:16 +0100 with message-id <20091101214116.GA12906@dedibox.ebzao.info> and subject line Re: Bug#276732: clone command documentation is wrong has caused the Debian Bug report #276732, regarding clone command documentation is wrong to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 276732: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=276732 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: clone command documentation is wrong
- From: Loïc Minier <lool@dooz.org>
- Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 02:12:29 +0200
- Message-id: <20041016001229.GA25577@via.ecp.fr>
Package: www.debian.org Severity: minor Hi, I tried to clone a bugreport without the need of reassigning it with: clone 252203 And mailserver replied: > clone 252203 Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. I think there's a problem in the mailserver's reference card and in the developers' information on manipulation of bugs: clone bugnumber [ new IDs ] is used and suggest IDs are optional. Regards, -- Loïc Minier <lool@dooz.org>
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 276732-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#276732: clone command documentation is wrong
- From: Simon Paillard <simon.paillard@resel.enst-bretagne.fr>
- Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 22:41:16 +0100
- Message-id: <20091101214116.GA12906@dedibox.ebzao.info>
- In-reply-to: <20041016014941.GA5871@localhost.localdomain>
- References: <20041016001229.GA25577@via.ecp.fr> <20041016014941.GA5871@localhost.localdomain>
On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 06:49:41PM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote: > On Sat, Oct 16, 2004 at 02:12:29AM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote: > > [...] > > I think there's a problem in the mailserver's reference card and in the > > developers' information on manipulation of bugs: > > clone bugnumber [ new IDs ] > > is used and suggest IDs are optional. > [...] > Seriously, the BTS documentation is based on the upstream version, so > we should let them fix it and then copy the changes to the web site. It was fixed on the website at least since CVS revision 1.70, and in debbugs: 2.4.2~exp0 * Fix the documentation of clone to indicate that you need at least one newID (closes: #276747) -- Simon Paillard
--- End Message ---