[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#529875: marked as done (http://packages.debian.org/testing/allpackages points to lenny)



Your message dated Sun, 7 Jun 2009 20:40:22 +0200
with message-id <20090607184022.GP17706@mail-vs.djpig.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#529875: http://packages.debian.org/testing/allpackages points to lenny
has caused the Debian Bug report #529875,
regarding http://packages.debian.org/testing/allpackages points to lenny
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
529875: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=529875
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: www.debian.org

On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 01:30:49PM -0700, Andrew Sharp wrote:
> I noticed that http://packages.debian.org/testing/allpackages
> still points to lenny, but should point to squeeze now.

Thanks for reporting this.  I've copied this message to the bug
tracking system, so that it doesn't fall through the cracks.

-- 
Matt                                                 http://ftbfs.org/




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 04:13:33PM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote:
> Package: www.debian.org
> 
> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 01:30:49PM -0700, Andrew Sharp wrote:
> > I noticed that http://packages.debian.org/testing/allpackages
> > still points to lenny, but should point to squeeze now.
> 
> Thanks for reporting this.  I've copied this message to the bug
> tracking system, so that it doesn't fall through the cracks.

Fixed.

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
www: http://www.djpig.de/


--- End Message ---

Reply to: